![]() Bookstore |
![]() Cyberlaw News |
|
![]() Discuss Law |
![]() Legal News |
![]()
Welcome to the 59th issue of the Mishpat Cyberlaw Informer - Law on the Internet newsletter from http://mishpat.net This newsletter is sent only to subscribers. If you no longer wish to receive the Cyberlaw Informer, follow the unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of this newsletter. -------------------------------------------------------- In this issue: 1. Introduction 2. Copyright Protection of Software 3. ICANN Elections 4. Cyberlaw resource review 5. Computer & Internet law news and updates -------------------------------------------------------- ################ 1. Introduction ################ I would like to welcome the many new subscribers who joined the Cyberlaw Informer since the previous issue. A special welcome is sent to the many subscribers who joined thanks to a recommendation in the FraudInfo newsletter. If you are not yet a FraudInfo subscriber, you can learn more about it by reading this issue's resource recommendation. The new Mishpat.Net directory is now available, including a new data structure with more than 1,450 law-related categories. Since collecting the information to include in all those categories is a complicated and time consuming task, many of the categories are currently empty. You can help creating the new directory by recommending resources that you think should be included. All you have to do is click on the "Add a Resource" link in the relevant category, and then fill in a simple form. Other categories (such as countries starting with the letters A,B, patents and more) are full with many links to legal resources, in some cases more then any other directory. http://mishpat.net This issue's feature article is a guest article by Elina Mangassarian about copyright protection of software. Elina brings a truly international account of technology law - she is a graduate of the Moscow State University Law School (Russia) and University of Leiden (Holland) and is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in the U.S. The article is a chapter from a paper about international perspectives of intellectual property protection in a technological environment. The full article (40 pages) is available, in (Microsoft Word format) at: http://mishpat.net/articles/elina.doc As usual you will find the cyberlaw news and the resource review sections at the end of this newsletter. I hope you enjoy reading the newsletter. Comments, tips, and articles are always welcome. Send them to mailto:editor@mishpat.net The Mishpat Cyberlaw Informer Archive (issues 1-57) is located at: http://mishpat.net/cyberlaw/archive Feel free to use any of the material, or forward the newsletter to a friend. Just don't forget to mention that they can subscribe to the Cyberlaw Informer by visiting http://CyberlawInformer.com --------- sponsor message ---------- USLaw.com - the easy way to law Easy to understand legal information for consumers and small businesses. Questions about the law? Go to Ask A Lawyer. You can have a private, one-on-one chat with a lawyer. Or, find a lawyer or law firm. http://mishpat.net/ads/uslaw --------- sponsor message ---------- #################################### 2. Copyright Protection of Software #################################### By Elina Mangassarian 1. General Remarks on Methods of Protection ----------------------------------------------------------- It is obvious that the new technological developments need to be sufficiently protected by legislation. Because of the global character of the developments in the area of computer programs, databases and telecommunications, legal protection is extremely important for any person who deals with these items. The main difficulty is connected with the necessity of protection of information and, consequently, with the means of accumulation, using, storage and dissemination of information. Therefore, the legal instruments in this field are very specific and are still discussed. Generally speaking, computer software (which involves computer programs), databases, information itself and information technology is covered by following types of legal protection: (a) by patents; (b) by copyright; (c) by provisions against the violation of trade secrets; (d) by rules on unfair competition; (e) by rule of contracts; (f) sui generis protection. Although these legal instruments have already been provided by the legal systems in most of the countries, the specific character of subject matters leads to the necessity of revision of the current legislation. This was the reason for detachment of computer law and law of the information technology as separate branches of law. The brief review of what the computer law involves, will be given further. 2. Computer Law and Copyright Protection ------------------------------------------------------ The appearance and development of computers and computer technology was the basis for creation of computer law in general. As Chris Reed fairly noted, "computer law continues to present new and varied set of challenges to lawyers, both practitioners and academics, as rapid advances in computing and communications technology are adopted by industry and commerce and integrated into everyday activities... This increasing interest in computer law derives form the rapid advances in the information technology industry". There are a lot of discussions on the determination of link between 'computer law' and 'information law'. The main positions on this issue may be summarized in a following way: (a) there is no principal distinction between these branches of law because computer law assumes the legal protection for information which is operated through computer; (b) there are no such separate branches of law and all these items are covered by existing legal instruments like copyright, patents and by legislation which protects the trade secrets; (c) computer law is that branch of the law which regulates information technology. The last point of view is very logical and complete because it is obvious that in practice computer law will always cover the information but it is not necessary for the 'information law' to be dealing with computers (information, in general, may be kept in any other form). Therefore, it should be highlighted that the unifying aspect of computer law is that it examines the technological aspects of information - i.e., it is the law which governs information processing as such. 3.Software as Subject for Copyright Protection --------------------------------------------------------- (a)What is software? For granting legal protection in respect of software it is necessary to provide more or less uniformly admitted notions of what software and which conditions should be fulfilled in order to be legally protected. This problem, obviously, is not new: there were discussions on the national level and there are still a lot of schools of thoughts on this issue from the international and common European law perspectives. As it has already been mentioned above, the term 'computer software' applies to computer programs and other materials prepared in connection with the use of computers. Computer programs are the most important kind of computer software. However, the legal definition of software cannot be given without technical determination of this term which is also very complicated. As it is pointed out by Chris Reed, "a complex piece of software may well consist of a number of programs... Some writers distinguish between programs (the specific executable code models) and software (the complete set of programs plus documentation)". But under his opinion, the term 'software' should be used 'interchangeably' for both of these elements otherwise it could create a lot of complications in practice. Under the TRIPs agreement, Article 10 provides the principles of the legal protection of computer programs and compilation of data - the term 'software' is not used in this document. Therefore it could be assumed that 'computer programs' are considered as software. Under the European Community legislation the Software Directive provides precise definition of the software. Although, as it was expressed by Christopher Millard in his article, these documents "shed much light on the definitional question", the preamble of the Directive provides, in particular, only the functional criterion of determination of computer programs: "the function of a computer program is to communicate and work together with other components of a computer system". As it can be concluded, this statement provides definition of software, but in a narrow way - only in respect of computer programs and only from the functional side. However, the definition of 'computer programs', given by the Directive is also not very precise. For instance, Article 1.1 of the Software Directive is a little more explicit in stating that "for the purpose of this Directive the term 'computer programs' shall include their preparatory design material". Generally speaking, the term 'software' has much more broader connotations than 'program'. This fact must be reflected in the relevant legislation because it is very important for the protection of users' rights, rights of the owners of software and for the producers of software. For comparison , under the US approach, software means "a set of computer programs, procedures, and possibly associated documentation concerned with the operation of a data processing system, e.g. compilers, library, routines, manuals, circuit diagrams". Thus, the legal notion of software is still questionable. It could be one of the most reasonable suggestions that "the answer is that at least where software is supplied on a physical medium it should be regarded as physical property, like a book or a record..." From this point it is possible to draw a conclusion that at the present time copyright protection for the software is much more effective and the copyright legislation thus allows to make more or less precise determination of this very specific and developing subject matter. (b) Copyright and software - general remarks Copyright is, in essence, a right given to authors or creators of 'works', such as books, films or computer programs, to control the copying or other exploitation of such works. But, as Christopher Millard pointed out, "in addition to controlling the making of copies, the owner of copyright in a work has the exclusive right to control publication, performance, broadcasting and the making of adaptations of the work". At present, there are two main types of protection of software (computer programs). From the one side, most of legislative acts, both international and national, extend copyright protection to computer programs, considering them as 'literary works'. From the other hand, the rights of creators of software are determined as sui generis rights which are covered due to 'computer law' as separate branch of law. The main question which arises with copyright protection of computer programs and software in general concerns the acts against which protection is needed. These acts involve not only the making of copies, but also the use of the software in the control of a computer. For the last element, copyright in its existing form does not grant effective protection, "since copyright laws normally only confer protection against the making of copies and public performance of works protected by copyright, but not against the execution of the work". Therefore it is obvious that in order to ensure full protection against unauthorized use, it may be necessary to amend the existing copyright laws. (c) Copyright and software under the EC law Within the European Community these amendments were made. It is necessary to note that the EC as a part of its Single Market program has produced legislation harmonizing many of the laws affecting the computer industry. The Software Directive has harmonized the legislation in the area of protection of computer programs. The role of copyright protection of computer programs within the EC is considered to be prevailing. As Christopher Millard notes, "of particular significance to the computer industry is the availability and scope of copyright protection for software products". However, some commentators have queried whether copyright is an appropriate means of protection for computer software. Nevertheless, in the European Commission Green Paper, issued in 1988, the view was expressed that copyright is the most appropriate form of protection for computer programs. This document was considered as a basis for adoption of a Directive of Software Protection. It should be highlighted again that article 1(1) of the Directive provides that computer programs are protected under copyright law as literary works. It also requires Member States to include preparatory design material in the definition of computer programs. But the Directive contains no definition of 'computer program'. The reason is considered to be obvious: by not defining this notion, the Directive avoids limiting the definition of computer programs to current technology. However, the seventh recital of the Directive determines what should be understood under the term 'computer program' which "shall include programs in any form, including those which are incorporated into hardware". This is a rather wide definition which allows to cover any type of software which will be elaborated in future and thus, will extend to new forms of computer technology. As Guy Tritton notes, "in keeping with the laws of copyright, the ideas and principles which underlie any element of a computer program including those which underlie its interfaces are not protected by copyright". Thus, for instance, an algorithm is not protected but the language code which is used to incorporate such an algorithm into a computer program is protected. With adoption of the Software Directive, the protection of computer programs as well as any other form of software becomes more and more powerful and effective. But even once the Directive has been implemented in all member States, differences will remain. As Guy Tritton noted, these include the definition of a "computer program", the test for "originality", the meaning of "adaptation", the copyright in computer-generated works and the authorship of commissioned software. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (C) Elina Mangassarian 2000 The full article (40 pages) is available, in (Microsoft Word format) at: http://mishpat.net/articles/elina.doc Elina Mangassarian is a recent graduate from Moscow State University Law School, Russia, and University of Leiden, The Netherlands, with specific areas of interest in Intellectual Property Law and International Trade. She is currently residing in the United States where she is pursuing her Ph.D. research. E-mail: mangassarian@hotmail.com" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------- sponsor message ---------- FreeShop FreeShop is the starting point for online shopping, featuring thousands of free and trial offers. Free samples, trial issues, demos, coupons, catalogs, trial periods, and product information. FreeShop.com is a leading online direct marketing network. Learn about or try new products, and choose from a variety of free, trial and promotional offers from hundreds of well-known companies. http://mishpat.net/ads/freeshop --------- sponsor message ---------- ####################### 3. ICANN Elections ####################### * ICAAN At-large election * The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which administers the Internet's addressing system, held it first public election to select five members to the international board that administers the Internet addressing. The election, which was conducted by Election.com, was held over a 10-day period. The direct election of five international representatives to the group's 19-member board, each from a different geographical district, was intended to allow individual Internet users more input into ICANN's decision making process. Of the 158,000 individuals who registered as ICANN at-large members, approximately 34,000 people actually voted, a result election organizers attributed to technical problems and potentially a lack of interest in the actual election (many joined At-large in order to influence the ICANN process through its working groups, not only by electing board members). The winners are: * North American region - Karl Auerbach, a researcher in the Advanced Internet Architectures group at Cisco. * Latin America/Caribbean region - Ivan Moura Campos, chief executive of Akwan Information Technologies in Brazil. * Europe - Andy Mueller-Maguhn, a self- employed journalist and consultant in Germany. * Asia/Pacific region - Masanobu Katoh, an employee of Fujitsu in Japan. * Africa - Nii Quaynor, an employee of Network Computer Systems in Ghana. At least two of the new board members are known to be critical of the current ICANN process and activities. The full results are available at: http://www.election.com/us/icann/icannresult.html ############################ 4. Cyberlaw resource review ############################ This week's resource is FraudInfo at http://FraudInfo.com published by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (CFE) at http://www.cfenet.com CFE is an international, 25,000-member professional organization dedicated to fighting fraud and white-collar crime. FraudInfo is a leading resource for detecting, preventing and reporting fraud. The site includes information geared towards consumers, businesses and anti-fraud professionals. Information available at FraudInfo.com includes fraud news (in association with Lexis-Nexis), reference to online resources, courses, software, articles and more. The weekly FraudInfo newsletter includes online fraud news, resource reviews, tips, book reviews and more. Subscribe at: http://www.fraudinfo.com/freeinfo/ If you would like to recommend an Internet legal resource, please send the details to mailto:editor@mishpat.net Full credit is given to contributors. You can also recommend resources at the online bulletin board http://mishpat.net/cgi-bin/bbs/UltraBoard.pl --------- sponsor message ---------- Law of the Super Searchers Learn about legal research than from the experts Law of the Super Searchers : The Online Secrets of Top Legal Researchers, consists of interviews with top legal researchers, and provides practical references to legal research processes. If legal research is part of your professional life, get "Law of the Super Searchers" from Amazon.com at 20% discount! http://mishpat.net/ads/research --------- sponsor message ---------- ############################# 5. Cyberlaw news and updates ############################# Mishpat Cyberlaw Informer brings you the latest news about online and computer law, with links to the full reports available on the web. Top news ======== * AOL Time Warner merger wins European antitrust approval * After winning European approval, America Online (AOL) and Time Warner may reach a deal on their planned merger with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) by month's end. The deal will combine AOL's vast Internet services with Time Warner's myriad of content and programming. AOL must satisfy the FTC that the new company will permit competitors to rent space on its cable lines so consumers have an array of choices for Internet service. Another issue concerns AOL's dominance of instant Internet messaging systems (AOL owns Instant Messenger and ICQ which are incompatible with others). http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-3167022.html * EMI, Time Warner drop merger plan * Time Warner and EMI Group have called off their $20 billion joint venture in the face of opposition from European regulators, removing a major obstacle to Time Warner's larger combination with America Online. The Time Warner-EMI deal would have created a giant music company, reducing the number of major record companies in the world from five to four. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2935428.html * U.S. selects Rijndael - a Belgian encryption system * The U.S. Department of Commerce's Standards Institute ended a three-year search for a new encryption technique by selecting Rijndael, named after its two Belgian creators Vincent Rijmen and Joan Daemen. Rijndael will replace the 25-year--old encryption standard known as DES that has been cracked by cryptographers. There is no cash award, and the creators, who met as university students, have agreed to make the algorithm freely available. The algorithm, which has been publicly available for more than a year, can be plugged into many kinds of software for sending email or managing computer files. Institute officials said that they expected to see the first commercial products incorporating Rijndael to appear within days. The Standards Institute estimates that today's computers would take approximately 149 trillion years to decrypt such a message. With current advances in computer technology the new standard should be effective for 30 years, that is as long as the so called "quantum computers" - that are supposed to change the notions of computing - do not become a reality. http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO51770,00.html * Did OpenTV invent One-Click Shopping * In the same week that Amazon.com and Barnesandnoble.com were back in court arguing over the "one- click" method of checking out of online stores, a third company claimed the right to the "invention". OpenTV, which creates software for interactive applications on television set-top boxes, claims it has filed an application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to expand a patent it first filed in 1994 and which it claims spelled out the fundamentals of one-click shopping three years before Amazon.com submitted its patent claims. OpenTV's patent, titled "Apparatus For Transmitting and Receiving Executable Applications As For A Multimedia System" includes the storage of consumer data on a TV set-top box so that users can navigate interactive-TV applications without having to manually enter personal information. Amazon.com's patent describes a similar one-click approach to pre-filling online forms based on customer information stores in its own databases. http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/00/156247.html * China issues "Big brother" rules * China issued new Internet restriction including control on foreign investment in Chinese Internet companies, and making companies responsible for any content on their sites that subverts state power, hurts reunification efforts with Taiwan, Spreading rumors, gambling, porn, and "harming ethnic unity" - a term used to prosecute suspected Tibetan independence activists and members of spiritual movements. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,39192,00.html * ICANN warns against new TLD pre-registration * The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers' (ICANN) Names Council warned that some companies offer pre- registration in Internet domains that do not exist. In a November meeting the ICANN board is expected to approve a handful of new generic top-level domains (gTLDs). http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/00/155955.html Intellectual Property =============== * Bill to limit business method patents * U.S. Congressmen introduced a bill that would make several changes to the business method patent process. Such patents would be harder to obtain, and easier to challenge. One of the important changes is creating a rebuttable presumption of non-obviousness for an invention that uses a computer to implement a known business practice. The bill would also create a new, expeditious, and inexpensive opposition process. http://www.techlawjournal.com/intelpro/20001003.asp * U.S. Supreme Court turns down PlayStation injunction * The U.S. Supreme Court will not consider the dispute between Sony and Connectix whose software allows people to run Sony PlayStation games on personal computers. The court, without comment, let Connectix continue selling its Virtual Game Station until a lower court rules on Sony's claim of unfair competition. http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,39209,00.html An article about the 9th Circuit court of Appeals, lifting the injunction, was published in Cyberlaw Informer #45 available at the online archive. * Cyberpatrol hack appeal rejected * An appeal by several people posting mirrored versions of the Cyberpatrol hack has been rejected due to a lack of standing. The appeal was filed by people not involved in the original case, and this is a technicality judgment rather than an examination of the merits of the case. Full decision at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=1st&navby=case&no=001503 * Is hyperlinking patented? British Telecom's hopes of enforcing its U.S. patent on Internet hyperlinking may be over, due to old movie clip which includes a prior demonstration of hyperlinking in 1968, 8 years before BT's patent. Movie at: http://sloan.stanford.edu/MouseSite/1968Demo.html * Times Square CBS logo leads to lawsuit * The owners of the landmark Times Square building from which the glittering New Year's ball drops each year, sued CBS Broadcasting. People watching CBS on new year's eve saw a depiction of Times Square that didn't exist - the building was emblazoned with the CBS logo, even though the building carried ads for NBC, Budweiser and Panasonic. When CBS noticed that anchorman Dan Rather would be broadcasting from a location that would show the Times Square NBC logo, they used digital technology to make it appear to viewers that the building had a giant CBS logo. Now the owner of the building filed suit alleging that CBS engaged in unfair competition, deceptive trade practices and trespass. http://www.law.com/cgi-bin/nwlink.cgi?ACG=ZZZDK9UNNDC * Digital Divas claim victory over Microsoft * Digital Divas, a small women's technology group, claims victory over Microsoft. Stacy Elliot, a Microsoft consumer product manager whom the company titled its official 'Digital Diva' is relinquishing her title after the Digital Divas threatened to sue the Microsoft for trademark infringement. Elliot, who tours the country dispensing advice on technology to first-time computer users, will now be called Microsoft's 'Digital Lifestyle Adviser'. http://www.digitaldivas.com/gol/ * Trademarking Ebook * Gemstar-TV Guide International applied to trademark the word EBook as well as the name "Gemstar Ebook". Gemstar is not the first company to attempt to trademark the term, but it is by far the biggest company to make such a move. The term e-book has a generic meaning referring to electronic versions of both fiction and nonfiction titles. http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,39232,00.html * Novell wins $2.4 million in piracy damages * Myung Ge, a South Korean OEM, has been ordered by a Utah district court to pay $2.4 million damages to Novell, after it was found guilty of counterfeiting software. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/13772.html * Sega threatens gaming sites * Sega sent out a series of cease-and-desist letters to websites for copying their documentation and the artwork that accompanies their games http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,39218,00.html * Microsoft sues alleged Atlanta pirates * Microsoft sued three Atlanta-area firms that allegedly sold counterfeit versions of the Windows operating system and other Microsoft products. http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/technology/tech-microsoft-piracy.html * Philips sues over communication chip patent * The U.S. unit of Royal Philips Electronics filed a lawsuit, alleging that six rivals infringed on a technology that helps computer chips communicate with one another. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-200-2918309.html * Nortel, Lucent sued for alleged patent infringement * Nortel Networks, Lucent, and 13 other telecommunications equipment manufacturers were sued by a Litton Industries for allegedly infringing a patent for a fiber amplifier used in fiber-optic transmission. Sales of fiber amplifiers for land networks is expected to total $390 million this year. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-2940381.html Domain names =========== * Ecards caves in * Ecards.com, a small Canadian Internet greeting card company is giving up its name to settle a lawsuit in which U.S. E-cards.com won a $4million jury verdict against it. Ecards will change its address to blab.com. E-cards claimed Ecards broke California and U.S. competition law because its almost identical name had supposedly confused consumers. http://www.globetechnology.com/archive/gam/News/20001007/RCARD.html * Celebrities win domain names * French actress Isabelle Adjani and Grammy Award winner Sade won the rights to their domain names after WIPO arbitrators ruled in their favor in cybersquatting cases. The interesting case is that of Helen Folsade Adu, who uses the stage name Sade. Sade.com was registered by Quantum Computer Services which offers Internet users personalized email addresses via its sites where they can select and assign themselves a "novelty" address. It registered sade.com. using the alias "The Sade Internet Fan Club". The arbitration panel found that Quantum intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to its website by creating a likelihood of confusion. It used a false name purely for the purpose of trading on Sade's goodwill. http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/10/technology/10CND-SQUAT.html (Free registration with the NY Times required) * BBC wins bbcnews.com * The British Broadcasting Corp. (BBC) won the right to the domain bbcnews.com. A WIPO arbitrator found that the registrants acted in bad faith. http://www.mercurycenter.com/svtech/news/breaking/merc/docs/019123.htm * Southern Australian government - a political cybersquatter * A staff member of the South Australian Government Premier John Olsen has been cybersquatting by registering the domain name of Opposition Leader Mike Rann. Simon Cope, a junior policy officer in the Premier's Department, registered the website mikerann.com. http://www.it.fairfax.com.au/breaking/20001012/A46196-2000Oct12.html * First Singaporean domain dispute settles * Singaporean website operator Hardware Zone's lawsuit against Sim Lim computer shop Video-Pro was settled. The shop, which added the .sg (Singapore's country top level domain suffix) to Hardware Zone's hardwarezone.com for its own site name, agreed to pay $10,000 to Hardware Zone, and transfer the address. Its defamation and copyright infringement counter-suit was also resolved. http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/cybernews/cyber8_0930_prt.html * Canadian Justice Minister wins domain name * Canadian Justice Minister Anne McLellan won domain names bearing her name. An arbitrator ruled that a Calgary Internet service provider, had both registered and was using annemclellan.com and annemclellan.org in bad faith and had no rights or legitimate interest in the names. http://www.eresolution.ca/services/dnd/decisions/0303.htm * Buchanan sues over domains with links to porn * Several sites with domain names that include Pat Buchanan's name (the U.S. Reform Party presidential nominee) link to pornographic sites. Buchanan is now suing the site owner. http://www.techserver.com/noframes/story/0,2294,500267556-500415789-502562228-0,00.html * Yahoo wins 50 domain names * Yahoo Inc. won 50 domain names, many of them based on misspellings of its trademarks. The domain names include yahoologins.com, and yahoomesenger.com. http://www.mercurycenter.com/svtech/news/breaking/merc/docs/023075.htm Cyber crime ========= * Theburglar.com - burglars' heaven * Theburglar.com, a site that connects victims of a burglary with the people who have their property is coming under law enforcement attack. The site connects "finders" whose identity is kept secret, victims, and insurance companies. It has been operating in the U.S. and Denmark for several months, and is now expanding into the UK. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/13875.html * Web sex scam * U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan blocked two British citizens who allegedly cashed in on remote dialing to sexually explicit sites. Thousands of US consumers were billed an average of nearly $250 last month for videotext services that they did not know had been accessed through their telephone lines. To use the system, special dialing software had to be downloaded. Once activated, the downloaded program disconnected from the normal Internet service provider; dialed a number assigned to Madagascar and directed the Web browser to a site featuring sexually explicit material on a server in the US. Charges for the remote link were $3.99 a minute. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2940766.html * Italian police stop Mafia online banking fraud * Italian police say they cracked a Mafia-led organization accused of planning to steal $680 million through an online bank fraud. Police said they managed to bust the ring before the money was transferred thanks to phone tapping. http://www.mercurycenter.com/svtech/news/breaking/internet/docs/473733l.htm * Florida online crime report * Florida law enforcement launched an online database that will allow users to check and see if someone they know is a wanted criminal or if items they want to buy are stolen. Any stolen item found can be reported by simply clicking on it to send an e-mail tip to the police. http://www.latimes.com/business/cutting/techwr/20001012/tCB00V0846.html Securities ======== * Italian Web-TV suspected of inflating number of subscribers * Shares of the Italian Web TV company Freedomland were suspended on Milan's Market after magistrates opened an investigation into suspected false accounting and share-price rigging. The company is suspected of having artificially inflated the number of its clients when it was seeking a stock market listing. http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,19132,00.html * Emulex suspect pleads no guilty * Mark Simeon Jakob, 23, accused of staging the stock hoax that sent the Emulex stock down $2.5 billion, pleaded not guilty to charges of planting false information. A U.S. magistrate set trial date to Nov. 21. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-3157132.html * Fox and TheStreet.com settle * Fox News Network settled a lawsuit against financial news site TheStreet.com and the company's top shareholder, fund manager James Cramer, over the site's cancellation of a weekly TV show the two companies jointly produced. TheStreet canceled the show that bore its name after Fox barred commentators from discussing stocks they own. As part of the settlement TheStreet agreed that it will not produce a similar financial show for any network until May 1. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2950655.html * Australian banned from giving online investment advice * The New South Wales Supreme Court (Australia) permanently banned the operator of The Chimes website from dealing in securities or giving investment advice without licenses required under the Corporations Law. http://www.it.fairfax.com.au/breaking/20001005/A33278-2000Oct5.html Privacy ====== * FTC wants more privacy regulation * Robert Pitofsky, head of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) gave commercial sites a C+ grade for protecting online privacy. Pitofsky urged Congress to give his agency new powers to ensure compliance with fair notice, choice, access and security. FTC proposed legislation would require sites to provide clear notice of their information practices and offer consumers choices on how their personal information is used beyond that for which it was provided. http://dowjones.work.com/index.asp?layout=story_news_tech&doc_id=12333 * Senator introduced a "Spyware Control Act" * U.S. Sen. John Edwards introduced legislation that would force software manufacturers to notify consumers when their products include spyware - bits of code that transmit information about the user's surfing habits back to the software company. http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/00/156365.html * Register.com customer info published online * A disgruntled former Register.com customer launched Registercom-sucks.com and posted the personal data of 100 people who registered domain names through Register.com. The site operator lost several domain names he registered trough Register.com, including walmartcanada.com, in arbitration rulings. While Register.com is outraged, the client information is publicly available through Whois queries. http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/00/155886.html * Suit against MAPS gets go-ahead * Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Socrates Manoukian ruled that Black Ice, a New Hampshire company, could pursue its claims against the Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS), an anti-spam organization set up to help ISPs screen SPAM email. Black Ice, a software maker, threatened legal action over being placed on the MAPS Blackhole List. http://www.mercurycenter.com/svtech/news/front/docs/maps101300.htm Online Speech =========== * Professors drop teacher review site defamation suit * Two California professors dropped a lawsuit against an online teacher review site they claim called them foul names such as 'insane', 'drugged out', and 'sex maniacs'. The professors say they decided to drop the case due to legal costs. Under the agreement, the two teachers will pay the American Civil Liberties Union $10,000 in attorney's fees. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,39258,00.html * Senators can't update sites during elections * Current regulations forbid U.S. Senate offices from updating their Web sites within 60 days of primary and general elections. The rule was supposed to discourage unfair politicking on Senate Web sites but critics claim that it is instead denying citizens valuable legislative information. http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/cti633.htm * Briton will pay for defamation * The High Court in London ruled that David Frankl sent defamatory messages to his former employer. Frankl was ordered to pay 26,000 pound as damages plus costs estimated at between 50,000 and 100,000 pounds. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/13949.html eCommerce ========= * Priceline under Connecticut AG investigation * Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal opened a consumer fraud investigation into Priceline's name-your-own-price service. The Connecticut Better Business Bureau kicked out Priceline as a member two weeks ago because of the number of customer complaints. http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/invest/ina162.htm * Online wine sales - finally resolved * The U.S. House of Representatives voted 371-1 to let states' attorney generals seek an injunction in federal court to stop illegal shipments of alcohol into the state. http://www.mercurycenter.com/svtech/news/breaking/ap/docs/488005l.htm * Motorola wants end-user consumer data * Independent dealers are being told by Motorola that they must turn over their proprietary customer data or lose the right to sell Motorola's popular two-way radios. The dealers fear that Motorola plans to use the data to sell directly to customers. http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2637528,00.html * Texas AG files suit against Bigsmart.com * The Texas Attorney General filed a lawsuit against Bigsmart.com accusing it of committing false, deceptive and misleading acts by operating an illegal pyramid promotional scheme. Meanwhile, BigSmart is fighting message board posters who criticized the company publicly, over the same allegations included in the Texas AG complaint. http://www.worldwidescam.com/home.htm#BigSmart I want to thank Robert Burtis for sending this information. Regulation ======== * Australian online gambling ban defeated in senate * A planned one-year ban on the issue of new Internet gambling licenses in Australia was defeated in Senate by a vote of 33 for and 33 against. The Interactive Gambling (Moratorium) Bill would have imposed a retrospective, one-year ban on the issue of any new licenses for online gambling operations. During that year, the feasibility and effects of a total ban would be examined. http://www.it.fairfax.com.au/breaking/20001010/A42346-2000Oct10.html * First U.S. legal gambling site * The first legal U.S. online gambling site, Virtgame.com, has been approved by the Nevada Gaming Control Board to distribute sports wagers online within Nevada. http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/00/156621.html * U.S. Supreme Court turns down ISP-Common Carrier case * The U.S. Supreme Court will not consider a lawsuit brought against America Online by several subscribers who said that the company should be regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as a common carrier in order to be subject it to federal rules on privacy rights and copyright protection. http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/00/156017.html * Disney accessed confidential AOL information * Walt Disney has been barred by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from reviewing sensitive documents filed by AOL and Time Warner about their merger, until assuring it will honor confidentiality agreements. A lawyer representing Disney at the FCC sent an email to other company staff with information from internal documents submitted by AOL. The lawyer realized his mistake within an hour but Disney, which opposes the AOL-Time Warner merger, waited five days to report the breach. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-3157119.html Misc. ===== * Microsoft sued over alleged worker bias * Microsoft is being sued by Monique Donaldson, a former program manager, who says that a job evaluation process discriminates against black and female employees. http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/05/business/05SOFT.html (Free registration with the NY Times required) * Microsoft gets slow pace trial * The Court of Appeals set the schedule for Microsoft's antitrust appeal, giving Microsoft almost all the time it asked for. The parties will file their final briefs on February 9th 2001. Oral arguments are planned for the very end of February. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,39396,00.html * AOL suits not limited o Virginia * Superior Court Judge Ronald Sabraw said that America Online (AOL) users who sue it should not be forced to transfer their lawsuits to the company's home state of Virginia because it is "unfair and unreasonable", since many small amount lawsuits are for sums much lower than travel costs. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/09/28/BU80948.DTL * Gateway sued over not so free Internet access * A class-action suit was filed in California, charging that Gateway misled customers when it offered free Internet access to users who purchased the company's products, but did not warn customers that many of them fell outside of the provided local access numbers, which meant that they paid long-distance fees for going online. http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/00/10/12/001012hngateway.xml That is all for this time, Yedidya (Didi) M. Melchior Editor
|
The Cyberlaw Informer |
![]()
|
Home |
About |
Comments |
Advertise With Us |
Bookstore |
Legal News |
Add a Resource |
|
Discuss Law |
Recommend this site |
Advanced Search |
What's New |
|
Israeli Lawyers |
Directory |
Privacy Policy |
Disclaimer |
Copyright © Mishpat-Net 1998-2004