![]() Bookstore |
![]() Cyberlaw News |
|
![]() Discuss Law |
![]() Legal News |
![]()
Welcome to the 53rd issue of the weekly Mishpat Cyberlaw Informer - Law on the net newsletter from http://mishpat.net This newsletter is sent only to subscribers. If you no longer wish to receive the Cyberlaw Informer, follow the unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of this newsletter. -------------------------------------------------------- In this issue: 1. Introduction 2. ICANN elections move forward 3. Cyber crime Part I - defining online crime 4. Cyberlaw resource review -------------------------------------------------------- ################ 1. Introduction ################ I would like to welcome the many new subscribers who joined the Cyberlaw Informer since the previous issue. This issue features the first of a four part series highlighting the new challenges law enforcement faces in an era of high-tech crime. The first article defines the ways in which computers can be involved in criminal activities. In the next few weeks we will take a look at law enforcement agencies new needs, at international law enforcement cooperation and jurisdictional challenges, and at alternatives to traditional law enforcement. This issue also includes a short review of the ICANN elections nomination procedure which ends next Monday (so hurry if you want to nominate any one), and the regular resource review section. The cyberlaw news section will be back next week. I hope you enjoy reading the newsletter. Comments, tips, and articles are always welcome. Send them to mailto:editor@mishpat.net The Mishpat Cyberlaw Informer Archive (issues 1-51) is located at: http://mishpat.net/cyberlaw/archive Feel free to use any of the material, or forward the newsletter to a friend. Just don't forget to mention that they can subscribe to the Cyberlaw Informer by visiting http://CyberlawInformer.com --------- sponsor message ---------- The Complete Internet Handbook for Lawyers The Complete Internet Handbook for Lawyers is intended to help make lawyers using the Internet more productive. Law librarians, paralegals and other legal professionals, as well as law students should also find much of interest in the book. The book covers general Internet usage, legal research, law firm marketing on the Internet, online ethics and security Get the Internet Handbook for Lawyers from Amazon.com at 20% discount! http://mishpat.net/ads/handbook --------- sponsor message ---------- ############################# 2. ICANN elections move forward ############################# As reported here a few month ago, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the non-profit, international corporation that oversees the management of the domain name system (DNS) and the allocation of IP address, started the "at-large" program. The program was created as a new way for Internet users from all over the globe to participate directly in the ICANN process and help ensure the smooth coordination of the Internet's technical infrastructure. Later this year, five ICANN Directors will be selected by ICANN's At Large Members in a worldwide online election. As the first step of the election process, ICANN has chartered a Nominating Committee to nominate a set of candidates for the consideration of the At Large Members. The ICANN Nominating Committee seeks recommendations and expressions of interest from members of the Internet community. Nomination by the Nominating Committee, along with self nomination, are the two avenues for candidates to appear on the final ballot. Recommendations and expressions of interest should contain the information set out on ICANN's nomination page at: http://www.icann.org/nomcom/call.htm and should be sent to nominations@icann.org no later than July 10, 2000 (next Monday). The Nominating Committee intends to complete its work by the end of July, after which the election process will proceed to: a self-nomination phase, in which candidates who were not nominated by the committee can seek a place on the ballot by attracting a minimum threshold of support from members in her/his region; a campaign period; and the vote of the At Large members. The Nominating Committee set out the following factors to consider in making its nominations: 1. Reputation for integrity and hard work; 2. Ability to exercise independent judgment; willingness to disclose obligations and potential conflicts of interest; 3. Professional/volunteer roles and accomplishments; 4. Understanding of the Internet's architecture and history; 5. Experience with the Internet's architecture; 6. Specific experience with the domain name and IP address systems; 7. Experience in international and/or multicultural environments; 8. Educational background; 9. The extent to which the individual would bring relevant skills or experience that are otherwise absent from the ICANN Board 10. Commitment: available time, energy, and interest; 11. Indications that the individual will find broad support in the At Large Membership; The ICANN at-large program: http://members.icann.org Nominating procedure: http://www.icann.org/nomcom/call.htm Remember: if you want to nominate any candidate, you have only until Monday July 10th. --------- sponsor message ---------- FreeShop FreeShop is the starting point for online shopping, featuring thousands of free and trial offers. Free samples, trial issues, demos, coupons, catalogs, trial periods, and product information. FreeShop.com is a leading online direct marketing network. Learn about or try new products, and choose from a variety of free, trial and promotional offers from hundreds of well-known companies. http://mishpat.net/ads/freeshop --------- sponsor message ---------- #################################### 3. Cybercrime Part I - defining online crime #################################### This is the first article in a four part series about cyber crime. As the Internet's potential to provide benefits to society continues to expand its potential to serve as a powerful new medium for those who wish to commit unlawful acts has also grown. Recent attacks against commercial web sites, such as Amazon.com, and other major Internet players such as Yahoo! CNN.com and ZDNet drew international attention to the dangers that the Internet and other computer networks need to face: Cyber-criminals and cyber-terrorists threaten business and government interests and may cause colossal damages. Online criminal activities target government agencies, commercial entities, and consumers, and employ various tactics including hacking, fraud, data interception, spreading computer viruses, and other methods. The use of new technology to commit traditional crimes, such as securities fraud, is not new. Advances in technology - the advent of the telephone, for instance - have always given wrongdoers new means for engaging in unlawful conduct. The Internet is no different: it is simply a new medium through which traditional crimes can now be committed, albeit through the use of inexpensive and widely available computer and telecommunications systems, and with unprecedented speed and on a far-reaching scale. At the same time the tools and capabilities associated with new technologies can in many instances help law enforcement agencies solve such crimes. Individuals who wish to use a computer as a tool to facilitate unlawful activity may find that the Internet provides a vast, inexpensive, and potentially anonymous way to commit International unlawful acts, such as fraud, the sale or distribution of child pornography, the sale of guns or drugs or other regulated substances without regulatory protections, and the unlawful distribution of computer software or other creative material protected by intellectual property rights. Hi-tech crime is different then other crimes since it is many times international in nature, uses new technological tools that might make it more difficult for law enforcement authorities to trace and locate the cyber criminals. National measures need to be supplemented by international co-operation including various forms of assistance such as preserving evidence and locating online suspects. As mentioned, this is the first of a four-parts series on cyber crime. The four articles are based on two recent initiatives to fight cybercrime: * The first is "The Electronic Frontier: The Challenge of Unlawful Conduct Involving the Use of the Internet", a Report by the U.S. President's Working Group on Unlawful Conduct on the Internet. The working group, chaired by the U.S. Attorney General, considered (1) the extent to which existing federal laws are sufficient to address unlawful conduct involving the use of the Internet; (2) the extent to which new tools, capabilities, or legal authorities may be needed for effective investigation and prosecution of such conduct; and (3) the potential for using education and empowerment tools to minimize the risks from such conduct. * The second is a draft released by the 41-nation Council of Europe for a Convention on crime in cyberspace. If adopted, this will be the first international treaty to address criminal law and procedural aspects of offending behavior directed against computer systems, networks or data as well as other similar abuses. The convention aims to harmonize national legislation in this field, facilitate investigations and allow efficient levels of cooperation between the authorities of different countries. Given the importance of the subject, non-member states, such as Canada, Japan, South Africa and the U.S., also participate in the negotiations. This part describes the different aspect of what constitutes cyber crime, and standards in evaluating online illegal activity. The next articles in this series will deal with the specific issues of fighting cyber crime such as the challenges law enforcement agencies face in light of cyber crime, and empowering Internet users. A. Unlawful Conduct Involving Computers ================================ Broadly speaking, computers can play three distinct roles in a criminal case. 1. A computer can be the target of an offense. One obvious way in which a computer can be involved in unlawful conduct is when the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of a computer's information or services is attacked. This form of crime targets a computer system, generally to acquire information stored on that computer system, to control the target system without authorization or payment, or to alter the integrity of data or interfere with the availability of the computer or server. Many of these violations involve gaining unauthorized access to the target system (i.e. "hacking" into it). Other cases may fall into the broad category of intellectual property theft. This includes not only the theft of trade secrets, but also much more common offenses involving the unauthorized duplication of copyrighted materials, especially software programs. Other cases may involve a perpetrator who seeks private information about another individual. The theft-of-service offenses are often associated with the practice of "weaving," in which a hacker traverses multiple systems to conceal his true identity and location. In this scenario, the sole reason for breaking into a given computer may be to use it as a stepping-stone for attacks on other systems. 2. A computer can be incidental to an offense, but still significant for law enforcement purposes. For example, drug traffickers may store transactional data (such as names, dates, and amounts) on computers, rather than in paper form. Another example is a hacker who uses a computer to store stolen password lists, credit card or calling card numbers, proprietary corporate information, pornographic image files, or "warez" (pirated commercial software). Computers have made it possible for law enforcement agencies to gather some information that may not have been previously even maintained in the physical world. For example, an unsophisticated offender, even after "deleting" computer files (as opposed to destroying paper records), might leave evidence of unlawful activity that a trained computer forensic expert could recover. 3. Computers can be a tool for committing an offense as a communications tool. Many of the crimes falling within this category are simply traditional crimes that are committed online. Online facilities may be used in the furtherance of a broad range of traditional unlawful activity. Email and chat sessions, for example, can be used to plan or coordinate almost any type of unlawful act, or even to communicate threats or extortion demands to victims. Chat rooms and online message boards are often used to spread false information regarding securities traded on stock exchanges around the world. Some criminal activities employ both the product delivery and communications features of the Internet. For example, pedophiles may use the Internet's file transfer utilities to distribute and receive child pornography, and use its communications features to make contact with children. B. Evaluating Unlawful Conduct on the Internet =================================== In its assessment of the extent to which existing laws are sufficient to address unlawful conduct involving the use of the Internet, the U.S. working group developed four general principles to guide its analysis. 1. Online-Offline Consistency First, substantive regulation of unlawful conduct (e.g. legislation providing civil or criminal penalties for given conduct) should, as a rule, apply in the same way to conduct in the cyberworld as it does to conduct in the physical world. If an activity is prohibited in the physical world but not on the Internet, then the Internet becomes a safe haven for that unlawful activity. Similarly, conduct that is not prohibited in the physical world should not be subject to prohibition merely because it is carried out in cyberspace. For example, fraud that is perpetrated through the use of the Internet should not be treated any differently, as a matter of substantive criminal law, from fraud that is perpetrated through the use of the telephone or the mail. 2. Appropriate Investigatory Tools Second, to enforce substantive laws that apply to online conduct, law enforcement authorities need appropriate tools for detecting and investigating unlawful conduct involving the Internet. Features of the Internet that make it different from prior technologies may justify the need for changes in laws and procedures that govern the detection and investigation of computer crimes. * The global and boundaryless nature of the Internet means that different law enforcement agencies in different jurisdictions will have to cooperate and coordinate their activities. * Anonymity on the Internet can facilitate fraud and deception. Misrepresentation of identity can also result in access by children to inappropriate material and can make criminal activity on the Internet more difficult to detect and prove. * The potential to reach vast audiences easily means that the scale of unlawful conduct involving the use of the Internet is often much wider than the same conduct in the offline world. For example, spreading a rumor about a specific stock on a business related online board reaches many investors simultaneously, and makes it much easier to manipulate stock price when compared to spreading the rumor offline. * The routine storage of information that can be linked to an individual can often provide more information to law enforcement than may be available in the offline world, if the electronic information is handled properly by a trained investigator. Thus, apart from ensuring that online and offline behavior is treated consistently as a matter of substantive law, legislators and policymakers should examine whether law enforcement agencies have appropriate tools to detect and investigate unlawful conduct involving the Internet. 3. Technology-Neutrality Third, to the extent specific regulation of online activity may be necessary, any such regulation should be drafted in a technology-neutral way. Regulation tied to a particular technology may quickly become obsolete and require further amendment. For example, regulation of "wire communications" may not account for the fact that communications may now occur through wireless means or by satellite. 4. Consideration of Other Societal Interests Fourth, any government regulation of conduct involving the use of the Internet requires a careful consideration of different societal interests, such as promoting free speech, protecting children, protecting privacy, providing broad access to public information, and supporting legitimate commerce. Accordingly, rules and regulations designed to protect the safety and security of Internet users should be carefully tailored to accomplish their objectives without unintended consequences, such as stifling the growth of the Internet or chilling its use as a free and open communication medium. For example, the rationale behind granting ISP immunity from liability in cases of third-party postings is that without this immunity, ISPs will act as censors and remove any controversial postings and web sites, thus threatening online freedom of speech. C. Addressing illegal online activity =========================== The U.S. working group recommended a 3-part approach for addressing unlawful conduct on the Internet: * First, any regulation of unlawful conduct involving the use of the Internet should be analyzed through a policy framework that ensures that online conduct is treated in a manner consistent with the way offline conduct is treated, in a technology-neutral manner, and in a manner that takes account of other important societal interests, such as privacy and protection of civil liberties; * Second, law enforcement needs and challenges posed by the Internet should be recognized as significant, particularly in the areas of resources, training, and the need for new investigative tools and capabilities, coordination among law enforcement agencies, and coordination with and among international counterparts; and * Third, there should be continued support for private sector leadership and the development of methods - such as cyber-ethics, appropriate technological tools, and media and other outreach efforts - that educate and empower Internet users to prevent and minimize the risks of unlawful activity. In the next part of this series we will address each of those components. The full text of the U.S. work group's recommendation can be found at: http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/unlawful.htm The text of the European convention draft can be found at: http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/projets/cybercrime.htm I want to thank Cyberlaw Informer reader Boaz Guttman for sending me these documents. --------- Sponsor message ---------- LegalSeeker In a single search, you can combine the knowledge base of 40 Legal search engines with the popular Web search engines - pinpointing the exact info you need with LegalSeeker. Designed for Internet users who desire to run highly comprehensive searches that combine the results of multiple search engines, LegalSeeker delivers a clean list of results that can be saved, viewed offline, easily organized, and updated automatically. Get you free trial (full price $99.95) Windows only. http://mishpat.net/ads/legalseeker --------- sponsor message ---------- ################# 4. Resource review ################# This week's resource is the Law and Politics: Internet Guide (LPIG) at: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/5011/ There are many online legal directories linking to other sites on the World Wide Web. Some of them are only lists of links, with no other content other than the links. LPIG is not different then many other legal links sites - it has a nice and organized list of links, its selection of sites is good, and the layout makes it easy to navigate. Unfortunately, the site is hosted on a free hosting service (GeoCities), with a hard to remember URL (the site does not have its own domain name). Another problem is that the links database is not searchable. However, LPIG has one unique feature that makes it stand out from the rest of the legal links sites. LPIG includes an automated site translation service, you can have any page on the site translated to more than a dozen languages. The translation service is provided by Translation Experts' InterTran service at http://www.tranexp.com, and any site can incorporate Translation Experts' technology for free. It isn't a perfect or sophisticated translation, but it does show the Internet is becoming more global in nature. Since the Cyberlaw Informer is international in nature (readers from more than 60 countries) I think that online legal researchers from different countries might find it easier to search using their mother-tongue. The sites listed on LPIG are all in English, so even if you use LPIG in Dutch you will end up having to read English on the linked sites, but this is a step in making a global community while preserving cultural and language differences. If you would like to recommend an Internet legal resource, please send the details to mailto:editor@mishpat.net Full credit is given to contributors. You can also recommend resources at the online bulletin board http://mishpat.net/cgi-bin/bbs/UltraBoard.pl That is all for this week, Yedidya (Didi) M. Melchior Editor ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you have enjoyed reading this newsletter and have found useful information in it, we'd appreciate your help in spreading the word about it. You can do this by forwarding a copy to your friends and telling them about it. To subscribe, please visit http://CyberlawInformer.com To unsubscribe, please go to http://mishpat.net/cyberlaw/unsubscribe.shtml Information on how to sponsor Mishpat Cyberlaw Informer mailto:advertising@mishpat.net Send suggestions and comments to mailto:editor@mishpat.net If you wish to contribute an article mailto:editor@mishpat.net Online archives http://mishpat.net/cyberlaw/archive Copyright 1999-2000 Mishpat.Net Internet Legal Information
|
The Cyberlaw Informer |
![]()
|
Home |
About |
Comments |
Advertise With Us |
Bookstore |
Legal News |
Add a Resource |
|
Discuss Law |
Recommend this site |
Advanced Search |
What's New |
|
Israeli Lawyers |
Directory |
Privacy Policy |
Disclaimer |
Copyright © Mishpat-Net 1998-2004